Apparently i have alot of old vl stuff on my computer
like the song in the fun forum i posted
http://forum.valhallalegends.com/index.php?topic=16052.0
and this
Valhalla Legends News
* May 7, 2000 - Security chat with Islanti - This occurred 6 days ago, but click to read where Blizzard's top network guy wants us to concentrate our efforts. He offers more than subtle hints in this dialogue.
* May 7, 2000 - By now you know I have removed the N privilege from everyone except leaders and Adron. This is how it was before the failed experiment. [vL] members removing other [vL] members names from safelist then banning them was the cause of the removal of this extra privilege. This really sucks for us because now instead of all of [vL] being able to add/modify names, now the leaders have to do the work.
* April 28, 2000 - Many of you may have noticed the bots are banning a lot more people. Here's the scoop. The server which was hosting the bots suddenly stopped hosting them. We have been unable to get to the server to retrieve the config file containing the access lists. The bots themselves were moved to another server, which is why you see them in the channel. Slowly we are rebuilding the access list. Until we are able to hook up with you and get your name added properly, the bots can ban you. This is simply a technical snafu and nothing personal directed at you. If you want to cry about this then perhaps you're just not the type of warrior that Odin would respect and honor.
* April 28, 2000 - More on the bot subject. Until the upcoming battle.net patches which will remove the account number, as well as required Diablo shareware to use a password, the [vL] bots control access to the channel by your battle.net client ID, a.k.a. account number. Some statements about this are needed.
1. If you provide us a unique account number, you will have full access to the bots under that number.
2. If you change your account number, the bots will not know you.
3. We're trying something where all [vL] members will have not only operator control of the bots, but the ability to add/remove/modify names on the list. It will remain this way until there is a reason to change it. Hint: Don't give us a reason to change it.
4. When adding names to the bots, -1 means match all account numbers. 0 means match for a chat bot. Any other number will match against the client ID of a binary client, or match against the IP of a text gateway client.
5. Guidelines for adding names:
o Do not add -1 for privileges other than F, B, or Z.
o If you -1 a name with S, be sure you whisper it to the [vL] so no one else sees it.
o If you -1 a name with any other privilege, it will be deleted when found.
o Do not use wildcards on names for any -1 or 0 account for other than F, B, or Z. If you add "0 [vL]Name* NOS" then anyone who creates a name beginning with [vL]Name and logs on a chat bot will have full access.
6. Some of you are having fun with ".ban *" which will ban everyone in the channel who is not safelisted "S" on access list. Cute, but each of us do have friends who like to visit. We won't tell you not to do it, as you all are [vL] because you are above needing a channel nanny, but a little restraint might earn you a little respect, don't you think? It's not the punk who uses a gun who is respected, but the soldier who doesn't need to use it.
7. Now that the web site is working correctly with Visual InterDev, a voting booth will be going up soon. The plan is for voting to work like this:
o Candidates will go to web page to apply for membership and a test.
o Any [vL] will be able to review the applications once submitted.
o Any [vL] leader will be able to reject applications and enter a reason for the rejection.
o Any [vL] leader will be able to accept the application, after which time he should interview the candidate and pass judgment. He marks his judgment on the candidates application under leader remarks.
o After three of the four [vL] leaders have approved the candidate on the web page, that candidate's voting becomes immediately open.
o Voting remains open until one of two things have happened.
1. At least 2/3 the members vote yes - candidate is approved.
2. At least 1/3 the members vote no - candidate is rejected.
o This pretty much means if people don't visit the web page and look at new candidates, they'll never have enough votes to be approved or rejected. The 2/3 and 1/3 go against the entire roster of [vL].
o The responsibility is yours to check the page to see if people are being voted on. If you don't get to vote on someone, it will be because you either didn't check the page, or because they accumulated enough votes to be approved or rejected and your vote wouldn't have changed the outcome.
o The votes and the count will be visible to all [vL] throughout the process. If you're the type who will be pressured into voting other than how you feel, then maybe you're not really a Valhalla Legend?
Shouldn't this be in the archives? They (http://www.valhallalegends.com/News.asp?date=0202) don't go back that far.
Dunno don't really look on the site much I was just going through some stuff im actually finding some more funny stuff ill post in a second
(http://denial.be/skygem.jpg)
(http://denial.be/spht.jpg)
Quote from: Denial on November 19, 2006, 01:25 AM
Dunno don't really look on the site much I was just going through some stuff im actually finding some more funny stuff ill post in a second
(http://denial.be/skygem.jpg)
Damn skywing's got a sweet illy.
[9:43:56 AM] ~ INVALID [vl]skywing
[9:44:11 AM] ~ [vl]skywing[vl]'s record:
[9:44:11 AM] ~ Normal games: 993660-0-758
Find security chat with Islanti plz.
Quote from: UserLoser on November 19, 2006, 11:54 AM
Find security chat with Islanti plz.
i have it somewhere as well i would have to look on my one of my disks
Islanti0501.htm.
http://web.archive.org/web/20001109191500/www.valhallalegends.com/news.shtml
Quote from: Newby on November 19, 2006, 10:16 PM
Islanti0501.htm.
http://web.archive.org/web/20001109191500/www.valhallalegends.com/news.shtml
That doesn't help considering the file isn't in the archive
Denial could search for that file if he so decided... Windows does have a search feature.
Quote from: Newby on November 20, 2006, 12:16 AM
Denial could search for that file if he so decided... Windows does have a search feature.
He said it was on a disk :p
Quote from: Denial on November 19, 2006, 01:25 AM
(http://denial.be/spht.jpg)
How random is that?
Quote from: UserLoser on November 19, 2006, 11:54 AM
Find security chat with Islanti plz.
It's 6 years old, how relevant could it really be now?
Islanti == AdrianL?
Quote from: Spht on November 20, 2006, 12:03 PM
Quote from: Denial on November 19, 2006, 01:25 AM
(http://denial.be/spht.jpg)
How random is that?
Quote from: UserLoser on November 19, 2006, 11:54 AM
Find security chat with Islanti plz.
It's 6 years old, how relevant could it really be now?
It could be an interesting read to see what they really had you vL people doing...
Quote from: Banana fanna fo fanna on November 20, 2006, 05:57 PM
Islanti == AdrianL?
AFAIK
I remember reading it and not really seeing anything too interesting. Then again, that was, if spht is correct, 6 years ago.
So far i went through like 18 cd's still havent found it got alot more cd's to go through but the good news is i found alot of other cool stuff in the process which i might post.
yeah multibot was awesome and so are .us domain names
Quote from: Banana fanna fo fanna on November 21, 2006, 12:33 AM
yeah multibot was awesome and so are .us domain names
That gave me a good laugh.
huh
Quote from: Banana fanna fo fanna on November 21, 2006, 12:33 AM
yeah multibot was awesome and so are .us domain names
..... i dunno get this did he post in the wrong thread?
Quote from: Denial on November 21, 2006, 07:56 PM
Quote from: Banana fanna fo fanna on November 21, 2006, 12:33 AM
yeah multibot was awesome and so are .us domain names
..... i dunno get this did he post in the wrong thread?
No, Ersan had posted something to the effect of "don't post it, save us our spare time because none of it is interesting."
I totally forgot I did that, must've been drunk.
It's still stupid.
Quote from: heRo on November 21, 2006, 11:39 AM
It isn't awesome, thats the funny part.
why?
Quote from: Ersan on November 30, 2006, 12:40 AM
I totally forgot I did that, must've been drunk.
It's still stupid.
Quote from: heRo on November 21, 2006, 11:39 AM
It isn't awesome, thats the funny part.
why?
Who seriously goes on the computer while drunk? Do you drink by your self in your room?
Nah I don't even drink, that was a farce.
Quote from: UserLoser on November 30, 2006, 11:29 AM
Who seriously goes on the computer while drunk? Do you drink by your self in your room?
Newby and Towelie. Man that T&T game ROCKED.
I drink with homos!
Quote from: heRo on November 30, 2006, 06:13 PM
I drink with homos!
You probably get penetrated by them, too.