Valhalla Legends Archive

Gaming => Gaming Discussion => Topic started by: Invert on March 17, 2003, 11:02 PM

Title: LOL++
Post by: Invert on March 17, 2003, 11:02 PM
http://www.fr4g.co.uk/fun/cs.jpg
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Mitosis on November 08, 2003, 12:11 PM
GAY++
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Skywing on November 08, 2003, 12:50 PM
Quote from: Mitosis on November 08, 2003, 12:11 PM
GAY++
Stop digging up old topics, especially when you have absolutely nothing of value to contribute.  Consider this your final warning.

- The Management
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Adron on November 08, 2003, 04:39 PM
Quote from: Skywing on November 08, 2003, 12:50 PM
Quote from: Mitosis on November 08, 2003, 12:11 PM
GAY++
Stop digging up old topics, especially when you have absolutely nothing of value to contribute.  Consider this your final warning.

- The Management

How about we make an arbitrary rule that Mitosis will be banned, always?
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: CupHead on November 08, 2003, 05:07 PM
I object.
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Archonist on November 09, 2003, 08:17 PM
Hmm, Why not delete all threads more than four months old?
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: hismajesty on November 09, 2003, 08:25 PM
Quote from: Archonist on November 09, 2003, 08:17 PM
Hmm, Why not delete all threads more than four months old?

Most people have enough sense to not bring up ~9 month old posts.
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Archonist on November 09, 2003, 08:32 PM
Quote from: hismajesty on November 09, 2003, 08:25 PM
Quote from: Archonist on November 09, 2003, 08:17 PM
Hmm, Why not delete all threads more than four months old?

Most people have enough sense to not bring up ~9 month old posts.

There's always those few that don't.  :(
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: j0k3r on November 09, 2003, 09:25 PM
Autolock topics that have been inactive for more than 2 months?
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Tuberload on November 10, 2003, 02:02 AM
I would have to disagree with deleting or locking old posts. Some people actually post threads of interest on a topic, not a conversation. Later on down the road if someone has a previously answered question they can find the thread explaining it. If I was to post an information oriented post, and figured out a better solution later on down the road and couldn't add to my previous thread anymore due to a lock that would be frustrating.

People just need to use a little more common sense when it comes to posting.
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: j0k3r on November 10, 2003, 06:19 AM
Quote from: Tuberload on November 10, 2003, 02:02 AM
People just need to use a little more common sense when it comes to posting.
That's like asking a retarded quadriplegic to tie his shoes.
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Tuberload on November 10, 2003, 01:51 PM
Quote from: j0k3r on November 10, 2003, 06:19 AM
Quote from: Tuberload on November 10, 2003, 02:02 AM
People just need to use a little more common sense when it comes to posting.
That's like asking a retarded quadriplegic to tie his shoes.
So we should limit functionality to legit users because we have retarded quadriplegics running around here? No we should just place speed bumps in the correct places and keep them out. ;D
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Hazard on November 10, 2003, 02:00 PM
Quote from: Yoni on August 18, 2003, 07:30 PM
DIE THREAD DIE
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Archonist on November 10, 2003, 03:03 PM
Quote from: Hazard on November 10, 2003, 02:00 PM
Quote from: Yoni on August 18, 2003, 07:30 PM
DIE THREAD DIE

That's not killing it, That's waking it from the dead!
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: j0k3r on November 10, 2003, 05:24 PM
Quote from: Tuberload on November 10, 2003, 01:51 PM
Quote from: j0k3r on November 10, 2003, 06:19 AM
Quote from: Tuberload on November 10, 2003, 02:02 AM
People just need to use a little more common sense when it comes to posting.
That's like asking a retarded quadriplegic to tie his shoes.
So we should limit functionality to legit users because we have retarded quadriplegics running around here? No we should just place speed bumps in the correct places and keep them out. ;D
Maybe we can use them AS speedbumps?
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: hismajesty on November 10, 2003, 06:11 PM
Quote from: j0k3r on November 10, 2003, 05:24 PM
Quote from: Tuberload on November 10, 2003, 01:51 PM
Quote from: j0k3r on November 10, 2003, 06:19 AM
Quote from: Tuberload on November 10, 2003, 02:02 AM
People just need to use a little more common sense when it comes to posting.
That's like asking a retarded quadriplegic to tie his shoes.
So we should limit functionality to legit users because we have retarded quadriplegics running around here? No we should just place speed bumps in the correct places and keep them out. ;D
Maybe we can use them AS speedbumps?

If they decline, I'll volunteer.
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Denial on November 14, 2003, 12:43 AM
Why not throw all the old posts and such into their own folder? Like Older then 4 month posts or such that way people can look at them and you can lock them or leave them up it's always up to you. That way everyone doesn't have to read them because their so old.
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: j0k3r on November 14, 2003, 06:41 AM
Quote from: j0k3r on November 09, 2003, 09:25 PM
Autolock topics that have been inactive for more than 2 months?
Title: Re:LOL++
Post by: Adron on November 15, 2003, 06:38 PM
Quote from: Denial on November 14, 2003, 12:43 AM
Why not throw all the old posts and such into their own folder? Like Older then 4 month posts or such that way people can look at them and you can lock them or leave them up it's always up to you. That way everyone doesn't have to read them because their so old.

Why would we want to mix up posts on different topics into the same place? The posts are sorted by date, so if you go backwards you can stop reading at however old posts you want to read. Noone forces you to read 8 month old posts. It's good that they show up in a search though.