Just recently got back into bnet but my question is...
...what packet am i looking at to register the cdkey? ("This cdkey is already inuse by ......")
I'm using BNLS.
I also forgot the link to Bnet Docs, anyone want to remind me? :)
Does Bnet Docs include documentation for BNLS or is there another place for that? Im just wondering on a certain packet.
Thanks ^^
It's sent in SID_AUTH_CHECK (0x51) (http://bnetdocs.valhallalegends.com/content.php?Section=m&Code=4).
Oh fair enough. For some reason i thought it was different with WAR3.
Thanks~
Im getting 'invaild version' back on 0x51 (WAR3).
Im sending;
Private Sub packx51()
InsertDWORD GTC
InsertDWORD Version
InsertDWORD Checksum
If sXpan Then
InsertDWORD &H2
Else
InsertDWORD &H1
End If
InsertDWORD &H0
InsertNonNTString CdkeyHash
If sXpan Then
InsertNonNTString Cdkey2Hash
End If
InsertNTString exeinfo
InsertNTString strUser
sendPacket &H51
Packet log please? We sorta need to know what info your sending.
But your format seems correct.
~-~(HDX)~-~
Quote from: WiLD on June 07, 2006, 10:30 AM
Just recently got back into bnet but my question is...
Quote from: WiLD on June 07, 2006, 11:36 AM
Im getting 'invaild version' back on 0x51 (WAR3).
Game binarys maybe out of date? (im pritty sure w3 patched a few month or so ago)
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on June 07, 2006, 11:53 AM
Packet log please? We sorta need to know what info your sending.
But your format seems correct.
~-~(HDX)~-~
Log file (http://reality-shock.com/log.cap)
(/me has no idea O.o)
Interesting, your 0x51 looks OK, only thing I can see now is the fact that BNLS is sending you outdated data. Maybe try using a local hashing library.. it's way more reliable, you don't have to rely on BNLS to update every time there is a new version of the game you are connecting to... BNCSUtil is an excellent hashing library. (http://bncsutil.ionws.com)
No...
Hes sending the wrong verbyte
Quote ff 50 3a 00 00 00 00 00 36 P:.....6
0040 38 58 49 33 52 41 57 0f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8XI3RAW.........
0050 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 55 ...............U
0060 53 41 00 55 6e 69 74 65 64 20 53 74 61 74 65 73 SA.United States
0070 00 ff 25 08 00 00 00 00 00 ..%......
Your not handeling 0x10 BNLS_REQUESTVERSIONBYTE properly
the current VB is 0x14 witch BNLS is sending you.
BTW, its annoying to have other connections in the log so everyone, for jsut this connection in the log use the following filter:
(tcp.port == 1622 and tcp.port == 9367) and (tcp.port == 1623 and tcp.port == 6112) and tcp.len > 0 and tcp.len != 34~-~(HDX)~-~
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on June 07, 2006, 05:06 PM
No...
Hes sending the wrong verbyte
Quoteff 50 3a 00 00 00 00 00 36 P:.....6
0040 38 58 49 33 52 41 57 0f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8XI3RAW.........
0050 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 55 ...............U
0060 53 41 00 55 6e 69 74 65 64 20 53 74 61 74 65 73 SA.United States
0070 00 ff 25 08 00 00 00 00 00 ..%......
Your not handeling 0x10 BNLS_REQUESTVERSIONBYTE properly
the current VB is 0x14 witch BNLS is sending you.
BTW, its annoying to have other connections in the log so everyone, for jsut this connection in the log use the following filter:
(tcp.port == 1622 and tcp.port == 9367) and (tcp.port == 1623 and tcp.port == 6112) and tcp.len > 0 and tcp.len != 34
~-~(HDX)~-~
ah lol i didn't check that packet =/
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on June 07, 2006, 05:06 PM
No...
Hes sending the wrong verbyte
Quote ff 50 3a 00 00 00 00 00 36 P:.....6
0040 38 58 49 33 52 41 57 0f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8XI3RAW.........
0050 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 55 ...............U
0060 53 41 00 55 6e 69 74 65 64 20 53 74 61 74 65 73 SA.United States
0070 00 ff 25 08 00 00 00 00 00 ..%......
Your not handeling 0x10 BNLS_REQUESTVERSIONBYTE properly
the current VB is 0x14 witch BNLS is sending you.
BTW, its annoying to have other connections in the log so everyone, for jsut this connection in the log use the following filter:
(tcp.port == 1622 and tcp.port == 9367) and (tcp.port == 1623 and tcp.port == 6112) and tcp.len > 0 and tcp.len != 34
~-~(HDX)~-~
Ahh i found it now! I hardcoded an old verbyte eariler but totally forgot about it.
I was looking for an effective filter, thats for that one.
Well all is working fine so i have moved onto 0x52 and after looking at Bnet Docs im stuck on;
(BYTE[32]) Salt (s)
(BYTE[32]) Verifier (v)
(STRING) Username
So what are the two bytes exactly?
Also dont you have to include the password?
the s/v are the password
these should be of some help:
http://www.javaop.com/~iago/SRP.html
BNLS_CHOOSENLSREVISION (http://bnetdocs.valhallalegends.com/content.php?Section=m&Code=175)
BNLS_LOGONCHALANGE (http://bnetdocs.valhallalegends.com/content.php?Section=m&Code=150)
BNLS_LOGONPROOF (http://bnetdocs.valhallalegends.com/content.php?Section=m&Code=152)
BNLS_CREATEACCOUNT (http://bnetdocs.valhallalegends.com/content.php?Section=m&Code=157)
Oh and the ever wonderfull BNLS Protocol Specifications (http://www.valhallalegends.com/yoni/BNLSProtocolSpec.txt)
Lear to readup boyo!
Have fun.
Should be more then enuf to get you going ont eh next few packets.
~-~(HDX)~-~