Valhalla Legends Archive

Programming => Battle.net Bot Development => Topic started by: Hdx on April 12, 2006, 01:25 PM

Title: BNLS updated for Warcraft III and The Frozen Throne patch 1.20d
Post by: Hdx on April 12, 2006, 01:25 PM
Game: Warcraft III TFT/ROC
Patch: 1.20d
VerByte: 0x14 (Unchanged)
VerHash: 0x011403b6
Hashes: Here (http://www.jbls.org/?page=hash)
Change log:
Quote--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patch 1.20d
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

FIXES

- Fixed an exploit that could happen in multiplayer games

JBLS server www.jbls.org is updated. Uploading the files to my mirriors right now.
~-~(HDX)~-~
Title: Re: WC3 1.20d
Post by: Spht on April 12, 2006, 02:11 PM
I always find out about these updates from you. :)  Keep it up.
Title: BNLS updated for Warcraft III and The Frozen Throne patch 1.20d
Post by: Spht on April 12, 2006, 02:18 PM
BNLS has been updated for Warcraft III and The Frozen Throne patch 1.20d.  Version byte (0x14) unchanged.

There were no major protocol changes in this patch.
Title: Re: BNLS updated for Warcraft III and The Frozen Throne patch 1.20d
Post by: Hdx on April 12, 2006, 04:03 PM
Ya, I like being the one to post it, Everyone expects me to.
+ the fact that I am like the lead site for versioning files.
I'll keep it up when i can.
~-~(HDX)~-~
Title: Re: BNLS updated for Warcraft III and The Frozen Throne patch 1.20d
Post by: PaiD on April 13, 2006, 11:25 AM
Cool, Thanks HdxBmx27 for the hashes.
Title: Re: BNLS updated for Warcraft III and The Frozen Throne patch 1.20d
Post by: Joe[x86] on April 13, 2006, 06:20 PM
I love those vague patch notes, too.
Title: Re: BNLS updated for Warcraft III and The Frozen Throne patch 1.20d
Post by: MyndFyre on April 13, 2006, 06:27 PM
Quote from: J on April 13, 2006, 06:20 PM
I love those vague patch notes, too.
What, would you prefer "Corrected an exploit that was called by making a far jump to offset 0x004023ac that caused Battle.net to award the exploiting player 2,000 wins and the non-exploiting player 2,000 losses." ?