Valhalla Legends Archive

General => General Discussion => Computer Support Issues => Topic started by: Beastfromteheast on March 08, 2006, 04:50 PM

Title: Connecting to Bnet through a proxy
Post by: Beastfromteheast on March 08, 2006, 04:50 PM
Hello,

I am trying to get my bot to connect to a trade channel on a realm server through a proxy. However, no matter what proxy i try (which have been tested working) I never make it into the channel. I correctly specified socks4/5 in the menu and I am certain I typed the address in correctly. Does anyone have any ideas on how I can get it to connect or have a proxy I can try which they have successfully connected with?

thanks
-Beast
Title: Re: Connecting to Bnet through a proxy
Post by: Kp on March 08, 2006, 09:01 PM
Does the SOCKS server return an error code?  If not, what's the last message that battle.net sends you?  It's possible you're not logging in correctly.

Your wording implies that you don't belong here, but I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and prompt you as though you're just clueless about debugging.
Title: Re: Connecting to Bnet through a proxy
Post by: Beastfromteheast on March 09, 2006, 12:04 AM
This is the message I'm getting.

[1:01:46 AM] [BNLS] Connecting...
[1:01:46 AM] [BNLS] Connected!
[1:01:46 AM] [BNLS] Authorized!
[1:01:46 AM] [PROXY] Connecting...
[1:01:46 AM] [PROXY] Connected!
[1:01:47 AM] [PROXY] 10053 -- Connection is aborted due to timeout or other failure
[1:01:47 AM] [PROXY] Disconnected.
[1:01:47 AM] All connections closed.
[1:01:47 AM] [PROXY] The Battle.net server has terminated your connection.
[1:01:47 AM] [PROXY] Attempting to reconnect...
Title: Re: Connecting to Bnet through a proxy
Post by: Mystical on March 09, 2006, 12:07 AM
Well, Im guessing your proxie is bad and/or (IPBanned) wouldn't you?
Title: Re: Connecting to Bnet through a proxy
Post by: Hero on March 09, 2006, 12:46 AM
61.183.37.227:1080
222.90.76.140:1080
60.191.41.125:1080
24.244.130.199:1080
203.76.188.125:1080
61.17.104.4:1080
201.252.52.159:1080
168.115.120.146:1080
202.149.219.214:1080
203.187.235.106:1080
200.126.186.180:1080
203.187.205.111:1080
203.187.222.121:1080
61.191.251.18:1080
210.211.172.175:1080
200.168.22.82:1080
219.72.230.2:1080
210.211.173.20:1080
202.68.133.186:1080
83.100.140.98:1080
218.22.246.34:1080
201.231.7.126:1080
200.168.132.162:1080
201.65.133.246:1080
218.56.32.2:1080
193.194.84.198:1080
201.21.154.191:1080
216.20.221.58:1080
201.245.51.138:1080
220.164.108.3:1080
200.179.218.47:1080
203.197.208.3:1080
213.93.75.149:1080
24.232.25.224:1080
200.126.145.178:1080
200.172.105.124:1080
209.254.227.243:1080
201.235.179.150:1080
200.114.70.101:1080
201.208.1.100:1080
201.249.11.91:1080
82.186.219.64:1080
81.22.87.134:1080
172.209.77.199:1080
200.204.176.83:1080
200.89.107.27:1080
61.12.47.144:1080
200.207.212.223:1080
201.252.65.103:1080
200.89.146.188:1080
210.212.176.238:1080
200.204.51.26:1080
200.114.174.159:1080
172.211.12.164:1080
58.51.89.8:1080
83.208.78.249:1080
200.179.246.102:1080
201.236.202.232:1080
200.45.47.217:1080
201.12.182.83:1080
Title: Re: Connecting to Bnet through a proxy
Post by: Beastfromteheast on March 09, 2006, 01:39 AM
Thank you hero. However, I still cannot connect. I now get this:

[2:38:24 AM] All connections closed.
[2:38:57 AM] [BNLS] Connecting...
[2:38:57 AM] [BNLS] Connected!
[2:38:57 AM] [BNLS] Authorized!
[2:38:57 AM] [PROXY] Connecting...
[2:38:58 AM] [PROXY] Connected!
[2:38:58 AM] [PROXY] SOCKS5 login succeeded. (0)
[2:38:58 AM] [BNET] Disconnected.
[2:38:58 AM] All connections closed.
Title: Re: Connecting to Bnet through a proxy
Post by: Hero on March 09, 2006, 01:59 AM
they are socks4
Title: Re: Connecting to Bnet through a proxy
Post by: Yegg on March 09, 2006, 08:16 AM
Quote from: HeRo on March 09, 2006, 01:59 AM
they are socks4

IIRC, specifying SOCKS4 as SOCKS5 will also work without a problem.
Title: Re: Connecting to Bnet through a proxy
Post by: Hero on March 09, 2006, 12:38 PM
that never worked for me (on a stealthbot, which he is using)
Title: Re: Connecting to Bnet through a proxy
Post by: Joe[x86] on March 09, 2006, 07:30 PM
If v5 of the SOCKS protocol supports reverse-compatiblity, it'd be the other way around.