Valhalla Legends Archive

Programming => Battle.net Bot Development => Topic started by: MasterMT on April 28, 2003, 09:09 AM

Title: Converting to new login
Post by: MasterMT on April 28, 2003, 09:09 AM
Thanks a lot for your help before Camel, but I think I'll just change my 0x1E, 0x12, 0x06, 0x07, 0x2D. 0x30/36 method to the new login method. If someone wants to give me a few URL's to help get me started, it'd be much appriciated. =)
Title: Re:Converting to new login
Post by: tA-Kane on April 28, 2003, 10:48 AM
Quote from: MasterMT on April 28, 2003, 09:09 AMThanks a lot for your help before Camel, but I think I'll just change my 0x1E, 0x12, 0x06, 0x07, 0x2D. 0x30/36 method to the new login method. If someone wants to give me a few URL's to help get me started, it'd be much appriciated. =)
Look at BnetDocs:
0x50, SID_AUTH_INFO
http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs/content.php?id=50&Sender=C
http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs/content.php?id=50&Sender=S
0x51, SID_AUTH_CHECK
http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs/content.php?id=51&Sender=C
http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs/content.php?id=51&Sender=S
Title: Re:Converting to new login
Post by: Camel on April 28, 2003, 09:50 PM
Quote from: MasterMT on April 28, 2003, 09:09 AM
Thanks a lot for your help before Camel, but I think I'll just change my 0x1E, 0x12, 0x06, 0x07, 0x2D. 0x30/36 method to the new login method. If someone wants to give me a few URL's to help get me started, it'd be much appriciated. =)

look up 0x50 and 0x51 in bnetdocs

most of the values in 0x50 can be BSed, aside from platform and product obviously
0x51 isn't too much of a change from the old style; the cd key hash changed slightly, but all the checkrevision crap is the same
Title: Re:Converting to new login
Post by: tA-Kane on April 29, 2003, 05:59 PM
Quote from: Maddox on April 28, 2003, 09:25 PMWhy give him a direct link there? You can only view it if you have an account, and if he did, why would he be asking?
If he does have an account, then maybe he just skimmed through BnetDocs and didn't see any (or all?) relevant information? If he doesn't have an account, maybe he doesn't know of BnetDocs?

Either way, the reason for giving a direct link is because that's where the information he was requesting is at. It's up to him to like/use BnetDocs.